Skip to main content

Indian banks need to be stress tested

  • The reasons for the banking mess are well known. What India is now battling is the inevitable result of a credit binge sponsored by the previous government. Bankers too misread the growth trajectory of the Indian economy after the quick recovery from the effects of the North Atlantic financial crisis. Individual projects got stuck in the regulatory morass during the last years of the second Manmohan Singh government.
  • It is now time to move beyond the game of pinning blame. There is a more immediate concern: what should be done?
  • The first task should be to throw more light on the extent of the problem. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governor Raghuram Rajan deserves credit for pushing banks to reveal the true state of their loan books. These asset quality reviews come just a few months after regulatory changes that push the promoters of defaulting companies to either bring in fresh equity or lose control of their enterprises.
  • Recent bad loan disclosures by banks have lent credence to the view that the problems run deeper than what senior bankers are admitting. Some of the estimates of bad loans are indeed scary. Both the RBI governor and the finance minister have spoken about how the worst fears of some analysts are unfounded—or what Rajan described in a recent speech as the “wild claims made by some financial analysts”.
  • The central bank needs to do rigorous stress tests of individual banks to quell the worst fears. RBI reveals the results of its systemic stress tests in its Financial Stability Report. The central bank now needs to provide the public similar information on individual banks. This is not just in the interests of transparency. The banks have to raise capital to meet the Basel III norms by 2019—and that will be difficult when there are widespread fears about the financial health of lenders.
  • The second challenge is how to deal with the mountain of bad debts that now sit in bank books. Banks will be in no position to fund an economic recovery unless they have adequate capital. One popular demand is that the Narendra Modi government should clean bank balance sheets through some version of the Troubled Assets Relief Programme (Tarp) that the US designed to clean up its financial sector after the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
  • There are two major problems here. Tarp dealt with securities that were traded in the market. So, the US government could eventually liquidate its holdings at a profit. An Indian Tarp would mean the acquisition of unfinished power plants that will not be easy to sell. The more potent problem is that such a programme will be seen as a bailout of powerful business houses by the Indian taxpayer.
  • There continue to be calls for the finance minister, in the coming budget, to allocate a substantial sum of money as capital infusion into the public sector banks. In a column published in this newspaper on Friday, Montek Singh Ahluwalia even suggested that capital transactions of this type need not be accounted for in the fiscal deficit calculations, if one goes by the standard International Monetary Fund format. But—leaving aside the national income accounting issues—even such a capital infusion will be funded by taxpayers to the benefit of defaulting businessmen.
  • As the owner of most of the largest banks in the country, the government will at some point have to bring capital into the public sector lenders. But such a bank bailout should not in effect become a bailout of powerful business groups. The pressure needs to be kept on them to restructure, deleverage, repay their loans—or lose control of their companies.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Recommendations of Deepak Mohanty Committee on Medium-term Path on Financial Inclusion

Recommendations of Deepak Mohanty Committee on Medium-term Path on Financial Inclusion The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has released the Report on Medium-term Path on Financial Inclusion submitted by 14-member committee headed by RBI Executive Director Deepak Mohanty. RBI had constituted the committee in July 2015 to examine the existing policy regarding financial inclusion and the for m a five-year (medium term) action plan. It was tasked to suggest plan on several components with regard to payments, deposits, credit, social security transfers, pension and insurance. Key recommendations : Cash transfer:  Augment the government social cash transfer in order to increase the personal disposable income of the poor. It would put the economy on a medium-term sustainable inclusion path. Sukanya Shiksha Scheme: Banks should make special efforts to step up account opening for females belonging to lower income group under this scheme for social cash transfer as a welfare measur

Environment Ministry notifies revised standards for Common Effluent Treatment Plants

Environment Ministry notifies revised standards for Common Effluent Treatment Plants (CETPs) Across industrial clusters-PIB CETP • The concept of common effluent treatment plant has been accepted as a  solution for collecting, conveying, treating, and disposing of the effluents  from the industrial estates. • The effluent include industrial wastewaters and domestic sewage generated  from the estate. • This CETP concept helps small and medium scale industries to dispose of  their effluents. Otherwise it may not be economical for these industries to  treat their wastewaters or there may be space constraints. • Some of these industries may require to give preliminary treatment (for  removal of solids) so that the receiving sewers can be maintained free  flowing. • It may be required to correct pH or removal of specific pollutant before the  industry discharges in CETP. CETP • CETP is designed on the basis of: – Quality and flow rate of the wastewater. – Effluent standard required by CE

India’s challenge of securing the seas

Three recent events underline India’s efforts to highlight its growing maritime interests and ambitions in order to secure them unilaterally and in partnership with others. The first was the quiet release of the Indian Maritime Security Strategy (IMSS) titled  Ensuring Secure Seas   in October. The second was the holding of the combined senior commanders’ conference, with top officers from all three services, on board   INS Vikramaditya , the Indian Navy’s latest aircraft carrier and its largest platform, in December. The last and most recent was India’s hosting of its second International Fleet Review (IFR) at Visakhapatnam in early February. While the pomp and circumstance as well as the photo-ops of the IFR, which attracted naval vessels from 50 countries, predictably, created the biggest splash, its significance is best understood in tandem with the 185-page IMSS-2015. Although the document is simultaneously comprehensive, conservative and cautious, it conveys one key message: