Skip to main content

Smart planning for smart cities

A smart city is not a destination, but a journey of several smart steps which will help change the way we live:


  • There are five essential components to the success of this mission: visionary leadership; global open standards; public private partnership; smart regulation (concerted efforts to identify regulations which do not lend themselves to a smart city and proactively address them—like stamping of boarding passes and hand baggage tags at airport security); and establishing new ecosystems to deliver these projects.

While we have witnessed visionary leadership at the top, percolating that vision down to the last urban local body continues to be an area of concern.
  • In the first stage of the competition, the process of citizen consultation was employed very well by most local governments. This is a healthy sign for participative governance. 
  • The mission will be a true success when it becomes more of a demand-driven, citizen-led phenomenon. And now is the time for the chosen cities to start thinking about the implementation process. It is also important for the government to identify possible bottlenecks and remove them.

The first phase of the smart cities competition has identified certain gaps. While the government has done a good job of creating a shortlisted pool of consultants, there needs to be a proper mechanism for pricing these proposals. Quality and cost-based selection criteria could be a potential solution to this as we move towards the next phase—setting up of the SPV and implementation.
  • Indian cities must learn from their counterparts in the West who are already deriving the results of being smart. While solutions from the West will not work lock, stock, and barrel in India, it is important to study their journey towards becoming smart. We should adopt and adapt relevant solutions from the West to suit our criteria.

* Building an integrated masterplan or a blueprint on how we conceive our smart city to be in the next 15-20 years;
* Leveraging ICT as a key enabler to delivering the smart city vision;
w Building an implementation plan with prioritised services based on citizen feedback and the monetisation potential of those services, thereby reducing overall funding requirements;
* Focusing on the most pressing problems of the city and looking for solutions specific to the city through consultation—what works for Pune might not work for Vizag. In the process, not forgetting the culture of the city;
* Planning an integrated network across all verticals in the city and avoiding the silo-based approach that most cities today use. This will allow for a more efficient means of service delivery to the citizens;
* Building an innovation ecosystem. Once all departments are connected to a single network, using Open Data to provide access to relevant data to the public and also invite start-ups to create apps to solve pertinent issues. In fact, a lot of innovation in smart cities could come from start-ups.
  • While discussions are largely about the Smart Cities Mission, we should not ignore the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation, which has the potential to deliver basic benefits to villages and whose impact could be more far-reaching than Smart Cities.
  • As the world watches us, we must keep in mind that this exercise is not only about having a 100 smart cities like Barcelona or Dubai in India, it is more about offering services that will improve the quality of life of our citizens. A smart city is not a destination, but a journey of several smart steps which will help change the way we live, work, learn and play.
Source: Financial Express

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

India’s challenge of securing the seas

Three recent events underline India’s efforts to highlight its growing maritime interests and ambitions in order to secure them unilaterally and in partnership with others. The first was the quiet release of the Indian Maritime Security Strategy (IMSS) titled  Ensuring Secure Seas   in October. The second was the holding of the combined senior commanders’ conference, with top officers from all three services, on board   INS Vikramaditya , the Indian Navy’s latest aircraft carrier and its largest platform, in December. The last and most recent was India’s hosting of its second International Fleet Review (IFR) at Visakhapatnam in early February. While the pomp and circumstance as well as the photo-ops of the IFR, which attracted naval vessels from 50 countries, predictably, created the biggest splash, its significance is best understood in tandem with the 185-page IMSS-2015. Although the document is simultaneously comprehensive, conservative and cautious, it conveys on...
Post a Comment
Read more

Differences between Indus civilization & Vedic Culture

What were the Differences between Indus civilization & Vedic Culture? The Indus civilization and Vedic culture constitute two great corner stone's in the history of Indian culture and civilization. When we make a comparison between the two, we notice more differences than similarities. Our sources of information of the Harappan civilization are mainly archaeological, while the Vedic culture is mostly known from the literary sources - the Vedas. Differences: Harappans are said to have been the original inhabitants of India while the Aryans, the founders of Vedic culture, are believed to have come to India from Central Asia. The Harappan civilization was urban in nature as is evidenced by its town-planning, drainage system, and granary and so on. The Vedic culture was rural. There is almost complete absence of towns in the Rigvedic period. At best the Rigvedic Aryans lived in fortified places protected by mud walls; and these cannot be regarded as towns in the Harap...
Post a Comment
Read more

India at 90th rank in terms of energy security, access: World Economic Forum

India  has been ranked at the  90th place in a list of 126 countries compiled by World Economic Forum (WEF) on the basis of their ability to deliver secure, affordable  and sustainable energy, which was topped by Switzerland . The latest  Global Energy Architecture Performance Index  Report, explored the energy architecture of 126 countries based on their ability to provide energy access across three dimensions of the "energy triangle" - affordability, environmental sustainability, security and access. The list was topped by Switzerland followed by Norway and Sweden in the second and third place, respectively. Others in the top 10 include France (4th), Denmark (5th), Austria (6th), Spain (7th), Colombia (8th), New Zealand (9th) and Uruguay (10th). Among the BRIC nations, Brazil was the top performer as it was ranked at the 25th place, followed by Russia (52nd), India (90th), China (94)y. Regarding India, the report noted that it is "facing a vast array o...
Post a Comment
Read more